-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PM-15360] Consider Credential Exchange export policies. #1263
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1263 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.46% 89.46%
=======================================
Files 732 732
Lines 46148 46159 +11
=======================================
+ Hits 41286 41297 +11
Misses 4862 4862 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Great job, no security vulnerabilities found in this Pull Request |
subject.state.showMainButton = false | ||
let task = Task { | ||
await subject.perform(.cancel) | ||
} | ||
defer { task.cancel() } | ||
|
||
try await waitForAsync { [weak self] in | ||
guard let self else { return true } | ||
return !coordinator.routes.isEmpty | ||
} | ||
|
||
XCTAssertEqual(.dismiss, coordinator.routes.last) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎨 Could this test be simplified to avoid the extra task and waitFor? It seems like everything in this flow uses async/await so the waitFor might not be necessary?
🎟️ Tracking
PM-15360
📔 Objective
Fail CXP export if disable personal vault export policy is enabled.
⏰ Reminders before review
🦮 Reviewer guidelines
:+1:
) or similar for great changes:memo:
) or ℹ️ (:information_source:
) for notes or general info:question:
) for questions:thinking:
) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:
) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion:art:
) for suggestions / improvements:x:
) or:warning:
) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention:seedling:
) or ♻️ (:recycle:
) for future improvements or indications of technical debt:pick:
) for minor or nitpick changes